Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

9 Jun
2009

Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

Manufacturer Description Designed with sports photographers and photojournalists in mind, the Nikon D3 introduces an astounding list of brand new features and technologies that make it the most sophisticated and advanced Nikon digital SLR to date. In addition to the new FX- format CMOS sensor, the D3 incorporates Nikon’s new EXPEED Image Processing System that is central to the blazing speed and processing power needed for many of the D3’s new features. The 12.1 effective megapixel (more…)



13 Responses to Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

Avatar

Zuriel

June 9th, 2009 at 10:29 am

The three major factors that, for me, make this camera (2 of them apply to the D300) so incredible are . . . well, the full frame sensor (finally), the outstanding low-noise/high ISO performance . . . and the extraordinary color! The photographer has a greater deal of control over color than ever before and the results are stunning (use Picture Control). And noise (the digital equivalent of film grain) is at least a 2-stop improvement over the previous D2x. Actually, it’s probably 3 stops, but say 2 to be conservative. Believe it or not, ISO 6400 is actually usable! (The D300 is one stop less)

While those features were the most compelling ones in my view, there are plenty of others that are a big plus, such as:

~ 9 frames per second
~ 51 point AF
~ Live View
~ 12mp CMOS sensor, self-cleaning on D300
~ A new 3″ LCD–about 4x the resolution as previous LCDs.

The list goes on, but you should read the tech specs and professional reviews. Suffice it to say it is loaded with features and handles like an absolute dream!

Compared to Canon’s $8000 professional models, this camera has a very clear advantage. Sure you lose some megapixels compared to the MarkIII, but that’s not so important for the majority of (but not all) photographers.

Another thought . . . while this is a good deal at $4999 compared to Canon, you can get almost the same camera for $1799, with the D300. If you don’t need a full frame . . . or the extra 1-stop high ISO, the D300 offers about 90 - 95% of the features and performance of the D3 for 40% of the price! If you want to get the best possible picture quality for the lowest possible price, consider the D300 and put the difference ($3200) on some of Nikon’s great new professional lenses.

As of this January 2008 writing, this is listed on Amazon at $6399 through Cameta Camera. PLEASE DON’T buy at this price and allow yourself to be exploited by the backorder situation. Instead, pre-paying $4999 for it at your local camera store puts you ahead of everyone else on the waitlist who merely put down deposits on it. Or wait until it comes down here on Amazon. Again, $4999! That’s the price. There is no need to pay an extra $1400 “sucker fee” for it just to have it a few weeks or maybe a month or two earlier. You survived until now without the D3, so you can make it a little longer–just don’t pay more than retail. $4999! $4999. $4999. Get the point? :-)

Post Script, April 16, 2008:

I notice this is now being sold by 17th Street Photo, who I’ve not done business with, but at least they are charging the *correct* price of $4999. First it was a $1400 markup, then $500, and it’s good to see the price gouging attempts appear to be dying down.

Post Script #2, November 2, 2008:

How times change–the gouging is gone, and so are the backorders. The price has dropped below $4500 I see. My opinion on this camera remains unchanged in the 11 months since I first got my hands on it, and it’s as excellent as it ever was, but now, with the introduction of the D700, I would have a hard time spending the approximately $4300 it now sells for, when the D700 is selling for $2699. The D3 is better built, and shoots 9 fps vs the D700’s 8 fps with battery pack, but I don’t see it being worth the added $1600 cost unless you’re a professional who shoots every day.

Avatar

Dusty

June 9th, 2009 at 11:04 am

I recently sold my Canon 1DS Mark2 and the accompaning 14 mm wide angle lenses because after trying out a Nikon D3 I found the Nikons pictures so much better. True, the Canon software is easier but to me the ergonomics of the D3 are better than the Canon 1DS Mark2 while the detail, clarity and accuracy are still better. Even 24″ poster comparisons between both camera’s have the Nikon winning in every detail. I am now a proud Nikon owner I think although Canon has more pixels 16.3 versus 12.1 the pictures at large a simply not as good. I perform operative photography and am in the process of finishing a book on Female Reconstructive surgery this is were the comparisons became for my field so much more apparent. The colors for the Nikon are just so much more dynamic and precise while the Canon is not as vibrant and demonstrative of detail. I found for comparisons sake that the Canon videocamcorder XL H1 colors versus the Sony comparable model to again lack color precision, depth of field and to simply to the less experienced eye to lack quality needed for surgeons. So I am now going to start to build a Nikkor lens assortment. By the way I took 20000 with my Canon so I know its downside well under all conditions. The Canon was sturdy and never a problem but its performance is only 80 percent of the Nikon and Nikkor lens

Avatar

Kaia

June 9th, 2009 at 11:05 am

5.0 out of 5 stars
Most Excellent (and then some)
Pros:
Image quality
Full frame 35mm film-size sensor
Low digital noise, even at high ISO (ASA) ratings
Two SD card slots
Three image modes (24×36,…

Avatar

Valtina

June 9th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

After having used Canon for years (from film based EOS -1 to IDMKII, a 5D, and even a 1D MK III), there is just no comparison! This camera handles like it was designed by a photographer, not a tech. It’s easy to do everything you want, and the quality is simply outstanding. If you’re debating it - don’t. Just get one and you’ll understand!

It has a TON of incredible features, but here are some of my favs:

I know everyone praises the low light abilities and they are outstanding. I am able to get landscapes that would have been impossible before. I normally had to shoot ISO 100, so a tripod was mandatory. Now I routinely use 400 and even 800! I can get into tight spots and hand-hold now! This feature alone has completely changed the way I do photography!

Another feature that I really like was the smaller AF areas. If you’re doing wildlife, it makes it much easier to lock on to your subject when the animal is in heavy brush (you know, like all the time). The Canons would always have a hard time in these situations, the Nikon grabs the focus immediately.

One last feature I’m really excited about is the virtual horizon. It makes keeping the camera level just so much easier. It has two ways of showing it - the first is a big display on the back that looks like it’s out of a 747 and is kind of useless. The second is to set your function button on the front of the camera for virtual horizon. Just press that in with your pinky while you look through the finder and the exposure meter turns into your virtual horizon. Just get it to “0″ and you’re level. Much easier to do than it sounds. I always thought My shots were level, but I was really surprised how often I needed a little tilt one way or the other.

The camera has incredible autofocus, a viewfinder so good you can actually manually focus with it if you like, an incredible screen on the back you can use to check focus accurately (impossible with any current Canon, at least by comparison), and so much more. Just a fantastic overall camera.

Avatar

Henley

June 9th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

3.0 out of 5 stars
Review from someone who didn’t pay for the camera
There is a tendency for people to always give good reviews to things they paid a ton of money for. My father in law owns this camera and paid for it.

Avatar

Winchell

June 9th, 2009 at 7:59 pm

5.0 out of 5 stars
Purchase from Cameta Camera
Cameta Camera provided excellent customer service for this purchase. The camera was refurbished and came with dust spots on the sensor.

Avatar

Tyanne

June 9th, 2009 at 9:15 pm

3.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing
Paid a lot of money for this camera, and was very disappointed with the noise issue i experienced. On top of that the color was not natural for the subject being captured.

Avatar

Fancy

June 10th, 2009 at 1:27 am

5.0 out of 5 stars
D3
This is an awesome camera. Color is rich and details are sharp. Two Card slots for memory is cool…

Avatar

Hala

June 10th, 2009 at 2:34 am

5.0 out of 5 stars
Nikon D3 Digital Camera Gets Top Rating
I’ve been using the D3 for several months now. It is arguably the best camera Nikon has ever made.
Image quality is superb, and the balance between sensor resolution…

Avatar

Xiu juan

June 10th, 2009 at 6:37 am

5.0 out of 5 stars
It’s a Nikon…need I say more???
There is little I can say that will do this camera justice. Simply stated, it’s the camera to end all cameras.

Avatar

Emerence

June 10th, 2009 at 8:56 am

4.0 out of 5 stars
d-3 great-where it came from not so
The D-3 Nikon has been great. The thing I’m concerned about was the box had been opened, the camera seemed to have been used and strap was missing.

Avatar

Nubia

June 10th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

5.0 out of 5 stars
amazing DSLR
Used my D3
for 8 months now and couldn’t be happier. This camera is an amazing piece of technology.
Bought my first film camera, Canon F-1 in 1985, shot thousands of pics…

Avatar

Jeneva

June 10th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

5.0 out of 5 stars
Not about the camera - It’s the glass that counts
We (my wife and I) have been using Nikon cameras and glass since the early ’70s. Over the years we have accumulated a good collection of glass and while we recognized we would…

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

top
Powered by Yahoo! Answers